The Qualitative explanation of consequences and patterns of behavior in rural livestock households facing the risk of Covid-19 (case: Izeh county)

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Geography Department, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

2 Master student of Geography and Rural Planning, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

The 2019 Covid-19 disease has caused disruptions in the production sectors, including smallholder farming systems and the livestock sector. The lived experiences of livestock farmers in facing the risk of Covid-19 have been advanced with the aim of identifying intervention strategies in current and future systems. This study deals with the understanding of lived experiences and resilient behavior patterns of rural livestock households in the face of the phenomenon of Covid-19 in Izeh city (Khuzestan province). This city is one of the areas with high potential for livestock and agricultural activities. Exploratory research method and data-based theory have been used. The current research has been carried out using qualitative research method, 17 active livestock farmers households with more than 50 animals and through semi-structured interviews. Based on the research data analysis process and scientific coding, 6 core categories include "disruption in the production cycle and household income"; "Intensification of the economic poverty of livestock farmers"; "Drought and seasonal diseases of livestock are resistant areas in the aggravation of the crisis conditions of livestock households"; "Demand and use of microfinance resources is an opportunity to get out of the crisis"; "Functional weakness of support and insurance structures"; And "socio-economic consequences during the severe risk of covid" were extracted. The focal phenomenon of the research is "Covid-19 and spatial inefficiency (structural-functional weakness)". This phenomenon explains that the existence of the risk of covid-19 reveals many institutional, political, economic and managerial inefficiencies in small livestock production systems and double pressures on livestock households. This research has provided conceptual and experimental ways to support smallholder agricultural systems, especially small farmers.

Keywords

References

  1. Ali, A. , Ahmed, M. , & Hassan, N. (2021). Socioeconomic impact of COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from rural mountain community in Pakistan. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(4), e2355.
  2. Awasth, Purnima, (2011), Socio-Economic Challenges and Sustainable Development in Developing Countries, management insight journal, 7(2), pp 56-63. (Accessed 10 Jun 2018).
  3. Bashir, M. F. , Ma, B. , & Shahzad, L. (2020). A brief review of socio-economic and environmental impact of Covid-19. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 13(12), 1403-1409.
  4. Beheshti, Mohammad Bager; mohamadzadeh, Parviz, (2018), Structural Changes and Income Inequality in Iran's Provinces, Journal Management System , 8(30) , pp 1-14.
  5. Blewitt, John, (2008), Understanding Sustainable Development, Earthscan Publication, First ed, London.
  6. Chan, K. , Xue, H. , Carlson, J. , Gray, J. M. , Bailey, J. , & Vines, R. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 on lifestyle and mental wellbeing in a drought-affected rural Australian population. Rural and Remote Health, 22(4), 7231-7231.
  7. Chiu, Rlh. (2003). Social sustainability and sustainable housing, Routledge Publication, First ed, London.
  8. Danilov, Victor; Losev, Kim; Reyf, Igor; (2009), Sustainable Development and the Limitation of Growth, Springer Publication, First ed, Berlin.
  9. Elliott, Jennifer. (2006), An Introduction to Sustainable Development, Routledge Publication, Third ed, London.
  10. Eshghi, Ali, Nazmfar, Hossein, Alavi, Hossein, (2019), Sustainable Development Evaluation provinces of Iran Based on environmental planning, Journal Management System ,9(33), pp 29-42
  11. Gharakhloo, Mehdi; Hoseini, Hadi. (2010), Indicators of urban sustainable development. Journal of Geography and Regional Development (Peer-Reviewed), 5(8), pp 157-177.
  12. Gu, H. Y. , & Wang, C. W. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on vegetable production and countermeasures from an agricultural insurance perspective. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(12), 2866-2876.
  13. Gulland, Milner; Akçakaya, Resit; (2001), Sustainability indices for exploited populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16(12), 686–692.
  14. Hancock, T (2001). Towards healthy and sustainable communities: Health environment and economy at the local level, Quebec, pp: 198-201, Klienburg, Ontario.
  15. Hoornweg, Daniel; Freire, Mila, (2013), Building Sustainablity in an urbanizing world, World Bank, first Ed, Washington DC.
  16. Hosinzadeh Dalir, Karim. , Ghorbani, Rasol. , Shokri Firozjah, Pari. , (2009), Analysis and qualitative assessment of urban sustainablity measures in the Tabriz city, urban-regional studies and research, Isfahan, 1(2), pp 1-18.
  17. Hosseini, H. , & Haghshenas, N. M, (2009, September). Dynamics of development and fertility convergence in Muslim countries. In th IUSSP International population conference.
  18. Janssens, W. , Pradhan, M. , de Groot, R. , Sidze, E. , Donfouet, H. P. P. , & Abajobir, A. (2021). The short-term economic effects of COVID-19 on low-income households in rural Kenya: An analysis using weekly financial household data. World Development, 138, 105280.
  19. Jucker, Rolf; Mathar, Reiner, (2015), Schooling for Sustainable Development in Europe, Springer International Publishing, first Ed, Switzerland.
  20. Luo, R. F. , Liu, C. F. , Gao, J. J. , Wang, T. Y. , Zhi, H. Y. , Shi, P. F. , & Huang, J. K. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural poverty and policy responses in China.  Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(12), 2946-2964.
  21. Lynch, Amy; Mosbah, Simon. (2017), Improving local measures of sustainability: A study of built-environment indicators in the United States. Cities, 60(1), pp301–313.
  22. Mahmud, M. , & Riley, E. (2021). Household response to an extreme shock: Evidence on the immediate impact of the Covid-19 lockdown on economic outcomes and well-being in rural Uganda. World Development, 140, 105318.
  23. Maoh, Hannah; Kanaroglou, Pavlos; (2009), A Tool for Evaluating Urban Sustain‌ability Via Integrated Transportion and Land Use Simulation Models, Urban Environnement, 3(2), pp 28- 49.
  24. Mishra, A. , Bruno, E. , & Zilberman, D. (2021). Compound natural and human disasters: Managing drought and COVID-19 to sustain global agriculture and food sectors. Science of the Total Environment, 754, 142210.
  25. Phillipson, J. , Gorton, M. , Turner, R. , Shucksmith, M. , Aitken-McDermott, K. , Areal, F. ,. . & Shortall, S. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and its implications for rural economies. Sustainability, 12(10), 3973.
  26. Shafi, M. , Liu, J. , Jian, D. , Rahman, I. U. , & Chen, X. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural communities: a cross-sectional study in the Sichuan Province of China. BMJ open, 11(8), e046745.
  27. Siche, R. (2020). What is the impact of COVID-19 disease on agriculture?. Scientia Agropecuaria, 11(1), 3-6.
  28. Statistical Center of Iran (2016).
  29. Wang, H. , Zhang, M. , Li, R. , Zhong, O. , Johnstone, H. , Zhou, H. ,. . & Rozelle, S. (2021). Tracking the effects of COVID-19 in rural China over time. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20(1), 1-13.
  30. COVID-19 disrupting mental health services in most countries. World Health organization, 2020. Available: https: //www. who. int/ news/item/05-10-2020-covid-19-disrupting-mental-health-services- in-most-countries-who-survey.
  31. Yaddanapudi, R. , & Mishra, A. K. (2022). Compound impact of drought and COVID-19 on agriculture yield in the USA. Science of the Total Environment, 807, 150801.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 30 January 2023
  • Revise Date: 08 April 2023
  • Accept Date: 20 April 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics