Evaluating the Economic Competitiveness of Metropolises in Iran

Authors

• E Aliakbari ¹
• F Khodadad kashi ²
• H Komasi ³

¹ Professor, Department of Geography ,Payame Noor University

² Professor, Department of Economics ,Payame Noor University

³ Department of Geography, Payame Noor University

Abstract

     Urban development and the globalization of the urban network have made economic competition for promoting competitive status among cities inevitable. Assessing the status and identifying the economic competitiveness factors in metropolises, along with revealing the strengths, needs and economic constraints, facilitate the future planning for the competitiveness of metropolises. The purpose of this paper was to compare the economic competitiveness positions of 15 metropolises in Iran. The data which were integrated and analyzed utilizing Numerical Taxonomy and TOPSIS methods were prepared for 14 economic indicators by documentary method.  The findings were indicative of the uneven development of economic competitiveness indicators in the most metropolises and the obvious differences among the metroplitans network. In total, the spatial distribution model of the economic competitiveness of the macroeconomic network of the country continued to be affected by the rules of perimeter center. Tehran with the index of 0.504 was in the first position while Zahedan with the index of 0.248 was in the last position of economic competitiveness. However, with the homogeneity of the data in the Numerical Taxonomy model, displacement and incremental changes as wll as a significant reduction in the economic competitiveness of the metropolises appeared. This, in turn, lead to probing into the factors, such as the population size, which are under the influence of the economic competitiveness of metropolitan cities and the factors, such as the number of job opportunities, which affect the economic competitiveness of metropolitan cities. Thus, it seems that economic superiority of the metropolitan area, as is seen in the demographic and political areas, does not represent the dominant and rivalry economic city with a high competitiveness index. As a result, by increasing the economic capacity of metropolitan cities, particularly through the main influencial indicators, it is possible to promote the position of economic competitiveness of metropolises and also to use it for research purposes in the national and regional areas.

Keywords

• ‌Economic competitiveness
• Iranian metropolises
• competitiveness factors
• competitiveness position

20.1001.1.22516735.1397.8.29.2.0

---

References

1. Delbari, M (2014): City Economic Competitiveness with Emphasis on Factors Affecting the Urban Competitiveness Index (GUCI), Iran, The first national conference in search of the city of tomorrow and the introduction of concepts and examples in the Islamic city of Iran. (in Persian)
2. Elahi, P.‌(2014): Planning of Kerman Historical City Center With the Emphasis on Urban Competitive Capacity Improvement, Department of Urban planning Faculty of Art and Architecture Tarbiat Modares University. (in Persian)
3. Feizpour,M.A.;‌Mojibifar,M;Mehdizadeh,‌M (2015): Urban competitiveness and Tehran position among the metropolises of Iran, the conference on the centralization and capitalization of the capital, Iran, Tarbiat modares university. (in Persian)
4. Gardiner, B., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2004): Competitiveness, productivity and economic growth across the European regions. Regional Studies, 38, 1037–1059.
5. Gorbani, R .(2014): An Overview on New Patterns of Urban Planning, Frozesh Publication, Iran. (in Persian)
http://www.un.org.
6. Jiang, Y., & Shen, J. (2010): Measuring the urban competitiveness of Chinese cities in 2000. Cities, 27(5), 307–314.
7. Kargar Samani, A.‌(2015): Developing a Model for Urban Competitiveness, Regarding Good Urban Governance Indexes in the Context of Globalization, Tarbiat Modares University, the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D) in Strategic Management.
8. Khajavi,‌M‌. (2010):‌Competitiveness and Components of Urban Economics", International Monthly Journal, No. (9) 2, pp. 61-60. (in Persian)
9. Kresl, P. (2013): The Competitiveness of Cities, United Nations Human Settlements Programme, UN-HABITAT.
10. Lengyel, I. (2003): Economic Growth and Competitiveness of Hungarian Regions. Paper prepared for „Reinventing Regions in the Global Economy“ RSA Conference, 12th – 15th April 2003, Pisa, Italy, p. 18.
11. Lengyel, I. (2016): Competitiveness of Metropolitan Regions in Visegrad Counties, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 223, 10 June 2016, Pages 357-362.
12. Paliulis, N; Cincikaite, R (2013): ASSESSING COMPETITIVENESS OF LITHUANIAN CITIES, Economics and Management.18,3.
13. Peng, Li; Zhanxin, Ma. (2011): The Evaluation of City Competitiveness in Shandong Province, Energy Procedia, 5, pp 472–476.
14. Reiljan, J., Henrikus, M., Ivanov, A. (2000): Key issues in defining and analyzing the competitiveness of a country. Tartu University Press, 59 p.
15. Saeedardakanii, S; Haddadian, S. (2013): EFFECT OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL STATUS OF ENTERPRISES ON THEIR COMPETITIVENESS, JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT (PAJOUHESHGAR) AUGUST 2013 , Volume 10 , Number 30. (in Persian)
16. Saez, L; Perianez, I. (2015): Benchmarking urban competitiveness in Europe to attract investment, Cities 48,pp 76–85.
17. Singhal, Sh; McGreal, S; Berry, J. (2013): An evaluative model for city competitiveness: Application to UK cities, Land Use Policy 30, 214-222.
18. Statistical Centre of Iran. (2011-2016).
19. United Nations ( 2016): The World’s Cities in 2016, available at:
20. Webster, D; Muller, L. (2000): Urban Competitiveness Assessment in Developing Country Urban Regions: The Road Forward, The World Bank.