The Nature of the Land Area of the City Center in Regional Planing Four spatial phenomena at the Metropolis TehranAbstrac

Authors

• mirnajaf mousavi
• amir fathi farzane

Abstract

Land in the city center is the outcome of relationships and physical performance. The extension of these relations complicates the understanding both spatial phenomenon and regional planning. This study has surveyed the four terms in regional planning (Metropolitan Region, City-Region, Functional Urban Region and Polycentric Urban Region) and it has paid attention to the explanation of every phenomenon’s nature by using of the comparative analysis method according to functional and morphological factors. The needed information has been collected in the documentary- library method. The Statistical methods and the models of planning such LQ and activity rate are used to adjust the spatial model of Tehran metropolis and its surrounding areas with the obtained theoretical framework. Thus, the optimized spatial model of Tehran metropolitan and its around has been presented in different scales. The findings show that Tehran metropolis accept the central roles not only in the complex scales such as national and regional but also between them. So, the existence of various patterns of functional interactions between Tehran metropolitan and its surrounding cities can add a new spatial nature to this metropolis and its surrounding areas. From physical viewpoint about the spatial phenomena, the urban based territories seem morphologically closer together. It is deserved that the spatial phenomena has been focused on the complex systems of morphological, functional, relational and political factors. The spatial nature of Tehran metropolis and its surrounding areas is studied in each of models. Therefore, three concepts of metropolitan region, functional urban region and city-region introduced as acceptable and definable spatial models in the various optimized scales.

Keywords

• Metropolitan region
• City-region
• Functional urban region
• Polycentricurban region
• Urban based territory
• Tehran metropolis

20.1001.1.22516735.1395.6.23.6.8

---

References

1. Asadi,E. and E. Zebardast, (2010): Typology of city-based Regions in Urban and Regional Studies,Scientific Quarterly of Fine Arts, 43,pp:17-30. In Persian
2. Bailey, N. and I. Turok, (2001): Central Scotland as a Polycentric Urban Region:Useful Planning Concept or Chimera? Urban Studies, 38, pp: 697–715.
3. Blotevogel, H. (2005): Metropolregionen In Handwörterbuch der Raumordnung, Hannover. Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung, pp:642 – 647.
4. BMBau. ( 1995): Raumordnungspolitischer Handlungsrahmen - Beschluss der Ministerkonferenz für Raumordnung. Bonn: Federal Ministry for Regional Planning, Building and Urban Development.
5. Brunel, D. (2002): Economic Performance of the European Regions. Papers of the Institut a` Ame´nagement et d’Urbanisme de la Re´gion Ile de France (IAURIF), 135, Paris CEBR (CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT BUSINESS RESEARCH) Symbiosis or sibling rivalry: future links between London and the South East. Centre for Environment Business Research Ltd, London.
6. Center of census (2006): Statistics population and housing census. In Persian
7. Davoudi, S (2008): Conceptions of the city-region: a critical review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Urban Design and Planning, 161, pp: 45-55.
8. Dieleman, F. and A. Faludi, (1998): Polynucleated metropolitan regions in Northwest Europe: Theme of the special issue. European Planning Studies, 6, pp:365-377.
9. Espon (2010): FOCI- Future Orientations for Cities. Draft final Scientific Report, Luxembourg.
10. Espon (2012): The Functional Urban Areas Database.
11. Forstall, R. and R. Greene, and J. Pick, (2008): Which are the largest? Why lists o major urban areas vary so greatly. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, pp: 277 - 297.
12. Gordon, P. and H. Richardson, and H. Wong, (1986): The distribution of population and employment in a polycentric city: the case of Los Angeles. Environment and Planning A, 18, pp: 161–173.
13. Hajipoor, K. (2008): The analysis of the causes and influential factors in the process which metropolitan regions form and develop, Scientific Quarterly of Fine Arts, 34,pp :37-48. In Persian
14. Healey, P. (2009): City Regions and Place Development. Regional Studies, 43, pp: 831-843.
15. Jonas, A. and k. Ward, (2007): mocracy and Social Reproduction. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31, pp: 169–78.
16. Medizadeh, J. (2004): Evolution on concept, role and structure of metropolises, Urban Management Quarterly, 17, pp. 18-31. In Persian
17. Miejers, E. (2007): Synergy in Polycentric Urban Region. Delf university.
18. Ministry of Housing and Urban Development (2000): Tehran conurbation plan. In Persian
19. Ministry of Housing and Urban Development (2008): South Alborz regional physical plan. In Persian
20. Neuman, M. and A. Hull, (2009): The Futures of the City Region. Regional Studies, 43, pp: 777-787.
21. Oecd (2007): Randstad Holland, Netherlands.
22. Painter, J. (2007): City-regions and the spatialities of urban-rural relations. City regions Writing\Conferences, seminars & talks.
23. Parr, J. (2004): The Polycentric Urban Region: A Closer Inspection. Regional Studies, 38, pp: 231-240.
24. Parr, J. (2005): Perspectives on the city‐region. Regional Studies, 39, pp: 555-566.
25. Parr, J. (2007): Spatial Definitions of the City: Four Perspectives. Urban Studies, 44, pp: 381-392.
26. 26.   Turok, I. and N. Bailey, (2004): The Theory of Polycentric Urban Regions and its Application to Central Scotland. European Planning Studies, 12, pp:371-389.
27. Turok, I. (2009): Limits to the Mega-City Region: Conflicting Local and Regional Needs. Regional Studies, 43, pp:845-86.