Spatial zone of Rural Settlements Expose to Environmental Disasters by Using Multi- criteria Decision-Making Techniques VIKOR (Case Study: Talesh County)

Authors

• ali alavi
• yaser ramezannejad
• ahad fatahi
• ebrahim khalifeh

Abstract

        Identifying areas vulnerable to natural disaster such as earthquake is one of the initial steps in the risk management plan development and construction. Earthquake is categorized as a natural disaster that could be the occurrence of loss, damage and cause a lot of damage. Natural disasters such as floods, earthquakes, etc. have always existed on the Earth life. In recent decades, despite massive advances in science and technology to predict events, construction-building and managing crises, natural disasters also have imposed heavy costs on human societies. Predict the location of the occurrence, severity and impact of many natural disasters require accessibility to a database of information. The purpose of this study is to identify villages at risk of earthquakes that require spatial zoning in earthquake-prone areas. Research Method is descriptive-analytical. Data collection is done by using library studies and studying documents. Data analysis is done by using the required digital layers, (VIKOR) model, Spatial zoning of vulnerable areas of rural exposed to Earthquakes in Talesh. The criteria used in this study are layers of geology, depth and intensity of earthquakes occurred in Talesh. AHP analytical model is used for weighting the criteria. After the spatial zoning operation in the Vikor Model, it was determined that there are 155 villages of 315 villages in Talesh county endangered by high risk of earthquake region. After rrevealing the villages at risk, the next step is to identify housing at risk (short-lived) in the rural areas in order to update and upgrade them for increasing the strength of them against earthquakes.

Keywords

• Spatial zoning
• Earthquake
• vikor method
• GIS
• Talesh

20.1001.1.22516735.1394.5.20.10.9

---

Full Text

Spatial zone of Rural Settlements Expose to Environmental Disasters by Using Multi­- criteria Decision-MakingTechniques VIKOR (Case Study: Talesh County)

 

A. Alavi

Assistant Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Y. Ramezanzadeh[1]

Ph.D Candidate of Geography and Rural Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

A. A. Fatahi
Ph.D Candidate of Geography and Rural Planning,Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

E. Khalifeh

Ph.D Candidate of Geography and Rural Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

 

Abstract

        Identifying areas vulnerable to natural disaster such as earthquake is one of the initial steps in the risk management plan development and construction. Earthquake is categorized as a natural disaster that could be the occurrence of loss, damage and cause a lot of damage. Natural disasters such as floods, earthquakes, etc. have always existed on the Earth life. In recent decades, despite massive advances in science and technology to predict events, construction-building and managing crises, natural disasters also have imposed heavy costs on human societies. Predict the location of the occurrence, severity and impact of many natural disasters require accessibility to a database of information. The purpose of this study is to identify villages at risk of earthquakes that require spatial zoning in earthquake-prone areas. Research Method is descriptive-analytical. Data collection is done by using library studies and studying documents. Data analysis is done by using the required digital layers, (VIKOR) model, Spatial zoning of vulnerable areas of rural exposed to Earthquakes in Talesh. The criteria used in this study are layers of geology, depth and intensity of earthquakes occurred in Talesh. AHP analytical model is used for weighting the criteria. After the spatial zoning operation in the Vikor Model, it was determined that there are 155 villages of 315 villages in Talesh county endangered by high risk of earthquake region. After rrevealing the villages at risk, the next step is to identify housing at risk (short-lived) in the rural areas in order to update and upgrade them for increasing the strength of them against earthquakes.

 

Keywords:  Spatial zoning, Earthquake, Vikor method, Gis, Talesh.

 

References

1. آیالا، ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺳﻤﺎ (1389): «ژئومورفولوژی، مخاطرات طبیعی»، ترجمه: رضا خوش­رفتار، مجله رشد آموزش جغرافیا، شماره 2، تهران، صص 23- 14. 
2. بیرودیان، نادر (1385): مدیریت بحران اصول ایمنی در حوادث غیر منتظره، نشر جهاد دانشگاهی مشهد، مشهد.
3. پورسعید، تهمینه (1386): جایگاه شهرهای کوچک در سازمان فضایی غرب گیلان (مطالعه موردی شهر اسالم)، پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه آزاد واحد رشت.
4. پورشریفی، جواد (1376): «ریز پهنه­بندی لرزه­ای شهر قزوین با استفاده از روش انتشار امواج»، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد زمین شناسی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشکده تربیت مدرس.
5. رضایی، علی و کوروش پرتو (1384): «بررسی آسیب­پذیری بافت­های شهری در برابر بلایای طبیعی(زلزله، سیل) و ارائه راهکارهای لازم جهت کاهش اثرات آن (نمونه موردی: منطقه1 شهرداری تهران)»، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
6. روستا، شهرام و حسن احمدزاده (1391): «پهنه­بندی مناطق متأثر از خطر زمین لغزش در جاده­ای تبریز­­- مرند با استفاده از سنجش از دور و  GIS »، مجله پژوهش­های ژئومورفولوژی کمی، شماره1، مشهد، صص 58-47.
7. سازمان مدیریت و برنامه­ریزی کشور (1383): سند فرابخشی توسعه روستایی برنامه چهارم توسعه اقتصادی و اجتماعی، تهران: کمیته تدوین سند فرابخشی توسعه روستایی، تهران.
8. سعیدی، عباس؛ پولادی، کمال؛ پولادی، کمال؛ کریمی، سریر؛ شمس­الله، سهیلا و گوهر نصرتی (1387): دانشنامه مدیریت شهری و روستایی، سازمان شهرداری­ها و دهیاری­های کشور، تهران.
9. شریفی­کیا، محمد؛ امیری، شهرام و سیاوش شایان (1390): «سنجش آسیب­پذیری سکونتگاه­های روستایی ناحیه ولست از مخاطرات طبیعی»، فصلنامه برنامه­ریزی و آمایش فضا، دوره 15، شماره 1، تهران، صص150- 125.
10. شمسی­پور، علی اکبر و محمد شیخی (1389): «پهنه­بندی مناطق حساس و آسیب پذیری محیطی در ناحیه غرب فارس، با روش طبقه بندی فازی و فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی»، فصلنامه پژوه­­های جغرافیای طبیعی، شماره 73،  تهران، صص 68- 53.
11. عباسیان، بابک و پرویز شهبازی (1383): «اصول کلی در طرح و اجرای ساختمان­های روستایی در مناطق زلزله­خیز»، یازدهمین کنفرانس دانشجویان عمران سراسرکشور، هرمزگان، صص 186-179.
12. فرجی سبکبار، حسن علی و سید حسن مطیعی لنگرودی (1381): «مدل­های فضایی مکانی و پهنه­بندی»، نشریه مدیریت، شماره 64-63، تهران، صص 65-59.
13. قنواتی، عزت­الله؛ قلمی، شبنم و اصغر عبدلی (1388): «توانمندسازی مدیریت بحران شهری در جهت کاهش بلایای طبیعی (زلزله) نمونه موردی: شهر خرم­آباد»، فصلنامه جغرافیای طبیعی، سال اول، شماره4، تهران، صص 24-15.
14. قهرودی، منیژه (1388): «کاربرد  Web GIS در مدیریت یکپارچه مخاطرات طبیعی»، مجله امداد و نجات، دوره 1، شماره 1، تهران، صص 68-53.
15. کرم، عبدالامیر (1383): «کاربرد مدل ترکیب خطی وزین (WLC) مطالعه موردی: منقه سرخون استان چهارمحال و بختیاری»، مجله جغرایا و توسعه، زاهدان، صص 146- 131.
16. مولایی هشجین، نصراله (1379): گزارش طرح هادی روستایی بالاده، بنیاد مسکن انقلاب اسلامی، رشت.
17. ویسه، یدالله (1378): نگرشی بر مطالعات شهرسازی و برنامه­ریزی شهری در مناطق زلزله خیز، انتشارات مؤسسه بین­المللی زلزله شناسی و مهندسی زلزله، چاپ اول، تهران.
    1. Amiri, Aflaton and Tabatabaei Ramin. (2008): "Earthquake Risk Management Strategy Plan Using Nonparametric Estimation of Hazard Rate", American Journal of Applied Sciences 5 (5): ISSN 1546-9239, pp581-585.
    2. Oliveria, carlos Sousa, Roca, Antoni, Goula, Xavier, (2008): Assessing and Managing Earthquake Risk, Geo-scientific and Engineering Knowledge for Earthquake Risk Mitigation: developments, tools, techniques, Published by Springer.
    3. Champman, C.B.& Ward, S. (1997): Project Risk Management: Process, Techniques and insights, john Wiley and sons, chichichster. 
    4. Cutter, S.L, Mitchell, J.T., and Scott, M.S., (2000): Revealing the Vulnerability of People and Places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina, annals of association of American geographer’s. 90, pp713-737.
    5. FIG(2006(: The contribution of the surveying profession to Disaster Risk Management, A publication of FIG working Group 8.4 international federation of surveys(FIG), www.fig.net.
    6. Ford,(2002): Vulnerability: Concepts and Issues; A literature review of the concept of vulnerability, its definition and application in studies dealing with human-environment interactions,  part of PhD Scholarly Field Paper For course Geog*6100, University of Guelph.
    7. Ghafory Ashtiany, M (1999): Rescue Operation and Reconstructions in Iran, Disaster Prevention and Management, Volume 8, Number 1, MCB University, ISSN 0965- 3562.
    8. Jessamy, V.R., (2000): Program of Vulnerability of OECS, a historical analysis of root causes, The society for Caribbean studies annual conference paper, edited by Sandra courtman, v0l.3, ISSN 1471-2024, : http://www.scsonline. Freeserve.co.uk/o1vo3.html.
    9. Opricovic, Serafim and Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung (2006): Extended VIKOR Method in Comparison with Outranking Methods, European Journal of Operational Research.
    10. Red Cross,(2001): World Disaster Report, Red crescent publication.
    11. Shadfar, S., Norouzi, A. A., Goddosi, J., Geyomiyan, J (2005): Landslide Risk Zonation in Laktrashan Basin, Journal of Soil and Water Protection, No.1, PP.1-10.
    12. Smith K., (2000): Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster, 3rd Ed,Routledge, New York.
    13. Stonich,S., (2000): The Human Dimensions of Climate Change, The Political Ecology of Vulnerability, available on: http://www.isodarco.it/ courses/candriao1/paper candria01 stonich.html.
    14. The our community time. (2006): Earthquake Tips IITK-BMTPC , www.nicee.org.
    15. Trondheim, R.J, (2000): Reducing Disaster Vulnerability Through Local Knowledge and Capacity: The Case Earthquake prone Rural Communities in India and Nepal, Dr. ing Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Architecture and Fine Art Department of Town and Regional Planning.42, pp 92–111
    16. World Bank, (2006): Mainstreaming Hazard Risk Management in Rural Project, WRITEN BY Watson, Jolanta Kryspin, http://www.Worldbank.org/hazards.