نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکترای شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز، تبریز، ایران
2 کارشناسی ارشد طراحی شهری، واحد زنجان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، زنجان، ایران
3 استادیار شهرسازی، واحد زنجان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، زنجان، ایران
4 کارشناس ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Rural Guide Plan is part of the region physical plan leading to rural revitalization in terms of social, economic and physical runs. The plan is done with the aim of optimal distribution services as well as providing context to improve the socio-economic development in the rural areas. The aim of this descriptive-analytical study refers to assess the implementation effect of the Guide Plan in conducting socio-economic development and the quality life of rural settlements of Zanjan province. The statistical population of this documentary study is 381persons from villages where the plan was implemented and completed by sing Cochran formula and the error value 0.05 and confidence level of 95%. For analyzing the data t-test and path analysis were used. The research results show that the implemented plan with an average of 3.8 caused improvement in social indicators, but with an average of 2.18 has been little impact in economic indicators. In this context, Health and education variables respectively, with the T statistics 23.427 and 11.286 have maximum impact, and income variables with the T statistics 15.164 and -15.527 have minimal impact from the implementation of Guide Plan. To improve the performance of Rural Guide Plan, review of legislation, having adequate knowledge of villages, strengthening partnerships and special attention to the poor rural seems necessary
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Analyze the impact of the Implementing Rural Guide Plan in the Economic-Social Quality Life of Rural Settlements (Case Study: Zanjan Province)
V. Rabieifar[1]
Ph. D Student in Department of Urbanism, Islamic Art University of Tabriz, Iran
S. Sanati Monfared
MSc student in Department of Urban design, Islamic Azad University, zanjan, Iran
M. Sashourpou
Assistant professor, Department of urbanism, Azad University of zanjan, Iran
M. Hazrati
MSc student in of Geography and Rural Planning,Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Rural Guide Plan is part of the region physical plan leading to rural revitalization in terms of social, economic and physical runs. The plan is done with the aim of optimal distribution services as well as providing context to improve the socio-economic development in the rural areas. The aim of this descriptive-analytical study refers to assess the implementation effect of the Guide Plan in conducting socio-economic development and the quality life of rural settlements of Zanjan province. The statistical population of this documentary study is 381persons from villages where the plan was implemented and completed by sing Cochran formula and the error value 0.05 and confidence level of 95%. For analyzing the data t-test and path analysis were used. The research results show that the implemented plan with an average of 3.8 caused improvement in social indicators, but with an average of 2.18 has been little impact in economic indicators. In this context, Health and education variables respectively, with the T statistics 23.427 and 11.286 have maximum impact, and income variables with the T statistics 15.164 and -15.527 have minimal impact from the implementation of Guide Plan. To improve the performance of Rural Guide Plan, review of legislation, having adequate knowledge of villages, strengthening partnerships and special attention to the poor rural seems necessary.
Keywords: Rural Guide Plan, Quality of life, Rural settlements, Zanjan province.
23. Anderson, R. (2004) :Quality of life in rural meurope, European Foundation for the Improvement ofLiving and Working Conditions, Dublin.
24. Andrews, F. M & Withey, S. B.(1976): social indicators of well-being: the development and measurement of perceptual indicators, plenum, New York.
25. Byock, I.R. & Merriman, M.P. (1998): Measurming Quality of Life for Patients with Terminal Illness: The Missoula-Vitas Quality of Life Index, Palliative Medicine, 12.
26. Dajian & Peter, (2006):2010 World Expo and Urban Life Quality in Shanghai in Terms of Sustainable Development Chinese, Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, Vol. 4, No.1.
27. Diener, E. (2000): subjective well-being, american psychologists, Vol. 55, pp 34-43.
28. Fellner, Wolfgang J. (2004): Abs: Standard of Living An Indicator of Economic Success, Quality of Life in a Turbalent World, Conference Abstracts, Philadelphia, Nov.
29. Layard, r. (2005): happiness; lessons from a new science, public economics , new York.
30. Pipping, H.(1953): Standard of Living, Soietas Scientiarum Fennica, Helsinki.
31. Pukeliene, V. & starkauskiene, V. (2011): quality of life concept, measurement and challenges, sisteminiai tyrimai.
32. Report The Economist Intelligence Unit’s, (2010): quality-of-life index, Economist Intelligence Unit, London.
33. Roback, J. (1982): Wages, rents and the quality of life, Journal ofPolitical Economy, 90 (6): 1257-1278.
34. Schalock, R. (2004): the concept of quality of life: what we know and do not know, journal of intellectual disability research, Vol48, pp 203-216.
35. Schuessler, k.f & fisher, g.a (1985): quality of life research and sociology, annual review of sociology, Vol. 11, pp. 129-149.
36. WHO QoL Group (1993): Measuring Quality of Life: The Development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument, Geveva: World Health Organization.
)