ارزیابی تفاوت مکانی سرمایه اجتماعی در بهبود وضعیت تولیدی (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای شهرستان سیرجان)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

• ژاله کورکی نژاد

استادیار سیاست و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

10.30495/jzpm.2021.25940.3736

چکیده

اقتصاد روستایی شهرستان سیرجان به دلیل وجود پتانسیلهای کافی وابسته به تولید پسته است. اما به دلائل مختلف تولید کشاورزان در سطح بهینه نیست و درصد زیادی از منابع تولیدی هدر می‌رود. این مسئله سبب کاهش درآمد و بروز فقر به ویژه برای کشاورزان خرد می‌شود. گسترش و تقویت سرمایه اجتماعی به عنوان یک عامل تولید نرم‌افزاری و مؤثر بر وضعیت تولیدی کشاورزان در کنار سایر منابع سرمایه فیزیکی می‌تواند کمکی به کشاورزان در جهت بهبود شرایط تولیدی و درآمدی آنها باشد. در این مطالعه وضعیت کارایی کشاورزان ساکن روستاهای شهرستان سیرجان که تولید پسته اصلی‌ترین منبع معیشت آنهاست، با توجه به سرمایه اجتماعی می‌باشد. بنابراین ابتدا شاخص سرمایه اجتماعی با استفاده از نظر پاتنام در موقعیتهای جغرافیایی متفاوت روستاهای سیرجان محاسبه و کارایی تولید کشاورزان در حضور این عامل با روش تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها تعیین شد. سپس با کاربرد مدل توبیت عوامل مؤثر بر کارایی فنی کشاورزان شناسایی شد. آمار و اطلاعات مربوط به سال 98-1397 با استفاده از پرسشنامه که روایی و پایایی آن مورد بررسی قرار گرفت، جمع‌آوری شد. بر طبق یافته‌ها، روستاهای واقع در شمال و شرق شهرستان سیرجان از نظر سرمایه اجتماعی در سطح متوسط و روستاهای واقع در بخش غربی و جنوبی از نظر ابعاد اعتماد و هنجارها و انسجام اجتماعی در سطح متوسط ولی از نظر شبکه ارتباطات و مشارکت اجتماعی در سطح پایین ارزیابی شدند. با احتساب سرمایه اجتماعی مقادیر کارایی فنی در بین باغات واقع در شمال، شرق و غرب و جنوب به ترتیب 78/0، 72/0 و 43/0 تعیین شد. همچنین در تحلیل توبیت دیده شد که متغیرهای تحصیلات، تجربه، داشتن شغل دوم، شرکت در کلاسهای آموزشی، مکان جغرافیایی باغ، نوع سیستم آبیاری، عملکرد محصول، میزان مصرف آب و عامل سرمایه اجتماعی سبب ارتقای کارایی و اندازه باغ و فاصله روستا از شهر کارایی کشاورزان را کاهش داده است. در شرایطی که کشاورزان با محدودیتهای اجتماعی، نهادی و اقتصادی روبه‌رو هستند و با افزایش نهاده های معمول و گرانقیمت مثل سرمایه و نیروی کار دچار مشکل هستند، تقویت ابعاد مختلف سرمایه اجتماعی می‌تواند تولید و کارایی کشاورزان را افزایش و فقر را کاهش دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• سرمایه اجتماعی
• کارایی تولید
• مناطق روستایی
• سیرجان

20.1001.1.22516735.1401.12.48.17.1

---

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Spatial Difference of Social Capital in Improving the Production Status (Case Study: Villages of Sirjan County)

نویسنده [English]

• Jaleh Koorkinejad

Assistant Professor of Agricultural Policy and Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The rural economy of Sirjan is dependent on pistachio production due to the existence of sufficient potentials. However, for various reasons, farmer’s production is not at optimal level and a large percentage of scarce resources are wasted. This situation reduces farmer’s income and causes poverty, especially for small farmers. Strengthening social capital as a software factor, that affect production along with other sources of physical capital can help farmers to improve their production and income. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficiency of farmers living in rural areas of Sirjan, where pistachio production is their main source of livelihood, considering the role of social capital. Therefore, social capital index was calculated using Putnam idea in different geographical locations of villages and then production efficiency of farmers in the presence of this factor was determined using data envelopment analysis method. Finally, by using Tobit model, the factors affecting the technical efficiency of farmers were identified. Statistics were collected in 2018-2019 using a questionnaire that its validity and reliability were examined.
According to the findings, different dimension of social capital for villages located in the north and east of Sirjan city were at average level. Nevertheless, for villages located in the western and southern regions, trust, norms and social cohesion dimensions were at average level, but for communication network and social participation dimension were determined at low level. Taking into account social capital, technical efficiency scores among the gardens located in the north, east, west and south were determined to be 0.78, 0.72 and 0.43, respectively. Also Tobit analysis showed that education, experience, having second job, attending educational classes, geographical location of the garden, type of irrigation system, crop yield, water consumption and social capital factor improve the production efficiency but garden size and the distance from the villages to the city had negative effect on efficiency. In a situation where farmers face social, institutional and economic restrictions and have difficulty in increase common and expensive inputs such as capital and labor, strengthening the various dimensions of social capital can increase agricultural production and reduce poverty.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Social capital
• Sirjan
• production efficiency
• rural areas

مراجع

1. Abdpoor A. Asadabadi E. Shabanali Fami H. (2017): Analysis of the Role of Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Date Production in Bam City: With Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Iranian J Agric Econ Devel Resir. 2-48(3): 507-518. http: //doi.org: 10.22059/IJAEDR.2017.63969.
2. A. Sanginga. P. Njuki. J. Kaaria. S. Delve. R. (2008): Relationship between Social Capital and Livelihood Enhancing Capitals among Smallholder Farmers in Uganda. AAAE conference proceedings. pp. 539-541. http: //doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.52191.
3. Ahmadi, H. Ramezannejad Y. Khalifeh E. Fattahi A. (2015): Measurement and Evaluation of Social Sapital in Rural Settlements Using Fuzzy Ranking Technique (Case Study: Rural Villages of Asalam). Journal of Geographical Spatial Planning. 6(15): 95-108. [Persian]
4. Akhtar Mohagheghi M. Social Capital. First Edition. Tehran: Mehdi Akhtat Mohaheghi; 2006.
5. Al-Maruf A. Enhancing Disaster Resilience through Human Capital: Prospects for Adaptation to Cyclones in Coastal Bangladesh. 2017. Doctoral dissertation, Universität zu Köln.
6. Arsal A. Karim I. Salman D. Fahmid IM. Mahyudin A. Amiruddin A. (2020): Social Capital and Maize Farmer’s Income. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 575. 012101. http: //doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/575/1/012101.
7. Asghari Loghamjani S. Pourjafarabadi M. Poorabrahimabadi F. (2016): The Role of Strategic Products in the Livelihood of Rural Households (Case Study: Pistachio Cultivation in Sirjan). Quarterly Journal of Geographical Research. 13(2): 50-61. [Persian]
8. Ballet J. Sirven N. Requiers-Desjardins M. (2007): Social Capital and Natural Resource Management: A Critical Perspective. The Journal of Environment and Development. 16(4): 355-374. https: //doi.org/10.11772/F.1070496507310740.
9. Bandiera O. Barankay I. Rasul I. (2008): Social Capital in the Workplace: Evidence on Its Formation and Consequences. Labour Economics. 15: 725–749. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2007.07.006
10. Benin S. Smale M. Pender J. Gebremedhin B. Ehui S. (2004): The Economic Determinants of Cereal Crop Diversity on Farms in the Ethiopian Highlands. Agricultural Economics. 31(2‐3): 197-208. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00257.x
11. Beugelsijk S. Schaik T.V. (2005): Social Capital and Growth in European Regions: an Empirical Test. Europian Journal of Political Economy. 21: 301-324. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.07.004.
12. Bourdieu P. Capital Forms in Social Capital, Democracy and Development, by Kian Tajbakhsh, 2016 Translated to Persian by Afshin Khakbaz and Hassn Pouyan, Shirazh Publications, Tehran.
13. Casey T. Christ. K. (2005): Social Capital and Economic Performance in the American States. Social Sciences Quarterly. 28(4): 826–845. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00358.x
14. Celeman J.S. Foundations of Social Theory. Translated by: Manouchehr Sabouri. Nay Publishing. 2011. Tehran.
15. Chambers R.G. Pope R.D. (1996): Aggregate Productivity Measures. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 78(5): 1360-1365. https: //doi.org/10.2307/1243522.
16. Chambers R.G. (1996): A New Outlook at Input Output Technical Change and Productivity Measurement. University of Maryland. Working Paper, No.197840.
17. Chambers R.G. Chung. Y. Fare. R. (1996): Benefit and Distance Functions. Journal of Economic Theory. 70(2): 407–419. https: //doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1996.0096.
18. Esfanjari Kenari R. (2011): Economic Study of Laying Poultry Industry Units. M.Sc. thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University. Iran.
19. Faraji Sabokbar H. Rezaee H. Alemi A. (2015): Leveling of Rural Settlements with Emphasis on the Components of Social Capital, Case Study: Tirjerd sub-district, Abarkooh City. Regional Planning Quarterly. 5(18): 101-116. [Persian]
20. Fu Sh. Liu H. Hua Tan K. Zhan Y. Yalan Ding, Y. Qi W. (2018): How Social Capital Affects the Quality Performance of Agricultural Products: Evidence from a Binary Perspective of China. 10, 3390. https: // doi.org/ 10.3390/su10093009.
21. Heydari Sareban V. Bakhtar S. Ziarati M. (2018): The Effect of Social Capital on Sustainable Agricultural Development in Rural Areas (Case Study: Villages of Kermanshah Province. Geography and environmental sustainability. 27: 59-74. [Persian].
22. . Hoang V. N. Coelli T. (2011): Measurement of Agricultural Total Factor Productivity Growth Incorporating Environmental Factors: a Nutrients Balance Approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 62(3): 462-474. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.05.009.
23. Houshyar E. Chen B. Chen G.Q. (2019): Environmental Impacts of Rice Production Analyzed via Social Capital Development: An Iranian Case Study with a Life Cycle Assessment/Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Ecological Indicator. 105: 675-687. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.040.
24. Malekan A. Khani F. Motiee Langroodi H. Darban Astane A. (2020): The Impact of Social Capital on Improving Drought Resilience (Case Study: Kangaveh County Villages). Journal of Regional Planning. 10(38): 79-80. [Persian].
25. Markowska-Przybyla U. (2020): Does Social Capital Matter for Total Factor Productivity? Exploratory Evidence from Poland. Sustainability, 12, 9978. http: //doi.org: 10.3390/su12239978.
26. Mirfardi A. Heydari A. Amini Kho M. (2020): Measuring the Level of Social Mobility of Rural-Urban Immigrants and Its Relationship with Social Capital, Case Study: Immigrants of Yasuj and Madavan Cities. Journal of Regional Planning. 10(37): 123-140. [Persian].
27. Mohammadian F. Saamdeliri A. (2020): Economic Analysis of Wheat Production Efficiency in Kermanshah (Case Study: Ravansar-Sanjabi Area. Iranian J Agric Econ Devel Res. 2-51(3): 429-449. http: //doi.org: 10.22059/ijaedr.2019289330.668814. [Persian]
28. Naderi Mehdi K. Fitras M.H. Esfahani S.M.J. (2015): The Relationship between Social Capital Dimensions and Efficiency (Case Study of Saffron Farmers in Ferdows County). Research and rural Planning. 4(2): 21-34.
29. Nateghpour M.J. Firoozabadi S.A. (2006): Social Capital and Meta-Analysis of the Factors Affecting it. Social Sciences Letter. 28: 160-190. [Persian]
30. Nikcheh Farahani H. Nazari G.H. (2008): The Role of Social Capital in Labor Productivity. Tadbir Monthly. 202: 43-48.
31. Primont D. Fare R. (2001): Luenberger Productivity Indicators: Aggregation across Firms. Discussion Paper No. 6. Southern Illinois University Carbondale. http: //opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/econ_dp.
32. Rivera M. Knickel K. Díaz‐Puente J.M. Afonso A. (2018): The Role of Social Capital in Agricultural and Rural Development: Lessons Learnt from Case Studies in Seven Countries. Sociologia Ruralis. 59(1): 66-91. https: //doi.org/10.1111/soru.12218.
33. Roknaddin Eftekhari A. Mahmoudi S. Ghaffari Gh. Portaheri M. (2015): Explaining the Spatial Pattern of Social Capital in Sustainable Rural Development Case: Villages of Khorasan Razavi Province. Quarterly Journal of Space Economics and Rural Development. 4(11): 87-107.
34. Rostami F. Shabanali Fami H. Kalantari Kh. Mohammadi MA. (2011): A Study of Social Capital Development Mechanisms in the Iranian Higher Agricultural Education System Iranian J Agric Econ Devel Res. 2-42(2): 627-645.[Persian].
35. Sadeghi N. The Effect of Social Capital on the Total Factor Productivity, Case Study: Pistachio Producers in Zarand. 2011. M.Sc. Thesis. Supervisor: Dr. Hossein Mehrabi Boshrabadi, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran.
36. Salari Sardari F. Biravandzadeh M. Alizadeh S.D. (2014): The Role of Social Capital in Sustainable Local Development (Case Study: Urban and Rural Settlements of Assaluyeh Region). Journal of City Identity. 8(19): 77-88.
37. Serra T. Poli. E. (2015): Shadow Prices of Social Capital in Rural India. A Nonparametric Approach. European Journal of Operational Research. 2015. 240: 892-903. http: //doi.org.10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.019
38. Shafie Sabet N. Khaksar S. (2019): The Impact of Social Capital on the Participation of Villagers in Rural Development Programs with the Mediating Role of the Perceived Effects of Plans and Projects. Journal of Rural Research. 10(2): 258-275. http: //doi.org.22059/JRUR.2019.276097.1331 [Persian]
39. Shahpasand MR. Savari M. Sarani V. (2017): The Role of Social Capital on the Quality of Farmer’s Life in Diwandara City. Iranian J Agric Econ Devel Res. 2-48(3): 431-441. [Persian].
40. Souri A. Econometrics. Volume 1 and 2 with Application Eviews 8 and stata 12. Cultural Science Publishing. 2013. Iran. pp. 685-853
41. Tavakoli M. Mirzapour S. Shams Pouya M.K. (2015): Evaluation of Social Capital Components in Rural Areas of Khorramabad. Quarterly Journal of Geography and Development. 39: 26-41. [Persian]
42. Tavakoli M. Tajbakhsh K. (2008): Study and Aanalysis of Social Capital in Urban and Rural Areas of Sistan Border. Quarterly Journal of Village and Development. 11(2): 143-162.[Persian]
43. Wang X. McIntosh CS. Watson P. Zhang H. Lu Q. Technical Efficiency in Small Scale Irrigation Cooperative and Its Determinants from the Perspective of Social Capital Heterogeneity: The Case of Northwestern China. AAEA Annual Meeting, August 4-6-2013. Washangton D.C. http: //org. 10.22004/ag.econ.148070.
44. Wolz A. Buchenrie G. Gomez Y. Paloma S. (2010): Semi-Subsistence Farming, Farm Income and Social Capital in Bulgaria-Is There a Link? Quarterly Journal of International Agricultural. 49(4): 285-298. http: //doi.org: 10.22004/ag.econ.155554.
45. Whiteley P. F. (2000): Economic Growth and Social Capital. Political Studies. 48(3): 433-466. http: //org/10.1111/1467-9248.00269.